I follow a low carbohydrate, high fat diet to manage my blood sugar levels because most carbohydrates spike it to levels I consider unacceptable. My doctor recommends that I eat low fat, high carbohydrate, where the carbs are the so-called complex carbohydrates. These are things like potatoes, rice, pasta and whole wheat breads. Unfortunately, though the peaks aren't as high, I still get blood glucose spikes from these foods and those spikes leave me at higher numbers for longer.
I'm always interested to read about the research into these competing diets. Here's an interesting paper from Diabetologia, describing a comparison of low fat and low carbohydrate diets. In this case, the low fat diet did not appear to be the better choice for type 2 diabetics. Low carbohydrate diets improved glycaemic control when compared to the standard medical diet advice.
>>In type 2 diabetes, randomisation to advice to follow a low-carbohydrate diet transiently improves glycaemic control compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet producing a similar weight loss
My Experiment with Type 2 Diabetes
Can you really 'cure' type 2 diabetes with a starvation diet of 600 calories per day?
Sunday 30 September 2012
Saturday 29 September 2012
New Diabetes Treatment Blocks VEGF-B Protein Signalling
From "Gizmag".
According to the World Health Organization, there are currently 347 million diabetics worldwide, with 90 percent of those people having type II diabetes specifically. It occurs when fat accumulates in places such as muscles, blood vessels and the heart, causing the cells in those areas to no longer be sufficiently responsive to insulin. This insulin resistance, in turn, causes blood glucose levels to rise to dangerous levels. Ultimately, it can result in things such as heart disease, strokes, blindness, kidney failure, and amputations. Fortunately, however, an international team of scientists has just announced a new way of treating the disease.
>> Read the original article
According to the World Health Organization, there are currently 347 million diabetics worldwide, with 90 percent of those people having type II diabetes specifically. It occurs when fat accumulates in places such as muscles, blood vessels and the heart, causing the cells in those areas to no longer be sufficiently responsive to insulin. This insulin resistance, in turn, causes blood glucose levels to rise to dangerous levels. Ultimately, it can result in things such as heart disease, strokes, blindness, kidney failure, and amputations. Fortunately, however, an international team of scientists has just announced a new way of treating the disease.
>> Read the original article
Two Weeks On
It's now two weeks since I returned to my "normal" low carb, medium protein, high fat diet, following two weeks of 600 calories per day. The results have not been what I would have hoped for. I have regained a little weight, which I'm happy with, and my ability to exercise for longer and with greater intensity has returned. The problem is that my blood glucose levels have also increased, which is disappointing.
Before the experiment, my average fasting blood glucose (FBG) was approximately 5.6mmol/l (101mg/dL). This lowered during the starvation diet, as one would expect, to 5.1mmol/l (92mg/dL). A good improvement. However, in the two weeks since the experiment my FBG has been not only higher than during the experiment, but also greater than before the diet began. The lowest FBG I've seen was 5.7mmol/l (103mg/dL). The highest, this morning, was 6.1mmol/l (110mg/dL). The average has been around 5.8mmol/l (104mg/dL).
This doesn't seem like a huge increase and some might say that it's not that significant. I'm not happy with it though. I am disappointed with any FBG reading over 5.6mmol/l (101mg/dL) and very unhappy to see anything beginning with a 6.
I'm now considering my next experimental diet and exercise change to see if I can bring it back down again. Any suggestions a welcome!
Before the experiment, my average fasting blood glucose (FBG) was approximately 5.6mmol/l (101mg/dL). This lowered during the starvation diet, as one would expect, to 5.1mmol/l (92mg/dL). A good improvement. However, in the two weeks since the experiment my FBG has been not only higher than during the experiment, but also greater than before the diet began. The lowest FBG I've seen was 5.7mmol/l (103mg/dL). The highest, this morning, was 6.1mmol/l (110mg/dL). The average has been around 5.8mmol/l (104mg/dL).
This doesn't seem like a huge increase and some might say that it's not that significant. I'm not happy with it though. I am disappointed with any FBG reading over 5.6mmol/l (101mg/dL) and very unhappy to see anything beginning with a 6.
I'm now considering my next experimental diet and exercise change to see if I can bring it back down again. Any suggestions a welcome!
Tuesday 18 September 2012
Guest Post - High Intensity Exercise and Low Calorie Diet to Reverse Type 2 Diabetes
I'm really please to be able to bring you a guest post from a really good friend of mine, Pete. I used to work with him up until around eleven years ago and we've stayed friends since. When I was diagnosed, Pete was really helpful and supportive. He was able to give great advice from his knowledge of type 1 diabetes, which affects a family member. Little did we know that within a couple of weeks of my diagnosis, he would also be confirmed as a type 2 diabetic. However, through a similar plan to my experiment, and with a lot more strenuous exercise, Pete was able to reverse his diabetes to the point of passing a glucose tolerance test. No longer diabetic, not even pre-diabetic, here's Pete's plan in his own words...
Download the diet (PDF)
I have been following Richard’s experiment with the 600
calorie diet on his blog with great interest.
I should say at this point that Richard is a very good
friend of mine who I have known for over twelve years. I have a very personal
interest in seeing Richard succeed with his 600 calorie diet: I was diagnosed
with type 2 diabetes at the end of February 2012, some 6 weeks after Richard
received his own bad news on the subject.
Luckily for me (and Richard) the BBC showed “The Truth About Exercise”
on their Horizon program. This demonstrated the link between high intensity
exercise, regular exercise and reducing blood fat levels and, importantly,
visceral fat deposits. The program demonstrated the link between visceral fat
around the pancreas and liver and the development of type 2 diabetes. Visceral
fat is the stubborn, hard to get rid of fat that accumulates around internal
organs. It is thought that the presence of this fat around the pancreas
inhibits the correct production of insulin.
There is also some evidence that fat cells are more
resistant to insulin than muscle cells. If a person has more fat cells than
muscle cells, then the insulin becomes less effective overall, and glucose
remains circulating in the blood instead of being taken in to the cells to be
used as energy.
Horizon highlighted a recent study by Dr Niels Vollaard, of
the University of Bath, into the application of HighIntensity Training (HIT) for the reduction of visceral fat.
Clearly the Horizon program was of great interest. To cut to the chase, the key to HIT is as
follows:
Use an exercise bike, cross trainer or similar, set it to a high resistance and perform the following exercise 3 times a week:
Use an exercise bike, cross trainer or similar, set it to a high resistance and perform the following exercise 3 times a week:
·
Cycle / run flat out, as hard as possible for 20
seconds (timed).
·
Rest for 40 seconds.
·
Repeat the above 2 more times, making a total of
3 high-intensity bursts of exercise over 3 minutes.
WARNING! Do not
attempt this without first consulting your GP, making them fully aware of what
you intend to do, and having a physical. Please also watch the Horizon program
carefully before embarking on this.
Richard and I also discovered another study at the same time, at Newcastle University, showing that a very low
calorie diet of 600 calories a day could reverse type 2 diabetes.
I consulted my GP with an idea. What if I applied both
techniques together? What if I began using HIT and the low calorie diet in
concert? My GP gave me a clean bill of health to proceed, but told me to be
careful and to monitor my weight and, in particular, to watch out for adverse
physical reactions (heart palpitations, dizziness and so on).
I needed to lose the weight. When I started I weighed 93 ½
kilograms (that’s 14 stones 10 pounds in old money) – I’m only 5 feet 8 tall –
too heavy!
Fortunately I spent many years doing martial arts and gym
work (but obviously that had lapsed!).
Nevertheless I was determined to try this. On my first HIT session I had
already eaten. Bad idea. I was sick afterwards. Tip: only do HIT on an empty stomach!
The 600 calorie diet was another ball game and the first 3
weeks were very tough. I would go to bed hungry. I would wake up hungry. I was
hungry all day. I cut out all lunch (something I still do). However, I designed a very low carb, low fat,
protein high diet, which incorporated plenty of green veg and salad (I have
included it at the end for interested readers). I also ran it by a dietician,
who OK’d it (but frowned at the lack of lunch). However, after 3 weeks the
hunger subsided and I started getting the weight off.
I also steadily built up my use of the cross trainer. I do
the HIT sessions on setting 5 of a maximum 8 on resistance. I have built up to
doing a session in the morning of between 2.5 – 4.0 miles (time sometimes
limits me to 2 miles) on the cross trainer, 100 press-ups, 100 sit-ups and 40
arm curls with 13 Kg weights. Of course, I didn’t start at that level.
Initially I was doing ½ a mile and twenty press-ups. But I do them every day,
unless there’s a good reason why I can’t. I soon moved into a session on the
cross trainer in the evening as well. Now I average around 4 – 5 miles an
evening, taking around 20 - 25 minutes on average.
The exercise, in addition to HIT sessions is essential.
Remember, the heart is a muscle. If you start fasting and don’t exercise, your
muscles may begin to atrophy somewhat – the heart is a muscle! So keep the all
muscles fit and healthy.
All the time I tested my blood glucose levels. After a while
they started to reduce, bit by bit.
So what was the outcome?
At the end of May 2012 my GP gave me a second glucose tolerance test. The results were startling. My GP was delighted to tell me
that I no longer had type 2 diabetes.
I should add that I tested my blood glucose with a
proprietary glucose testing meter (about 8 or 10 times a day) for the entire
time. I still test my blood, but not quite as many times a day.
Is it a miracle cure? No. I know now that I will always be
predisposed to develop type 2 diabetes – if I let my discipline falter. So I
monitor my weight, I eat sensibly and I check my blood glucose. I will always
do the exercise. Why? Because I was in a place physically that I couldn’t
afford to stay in and I definitely don’t want to have to take the medication.
Downsides? I had to buy a new set of clothes. I now weigh 11 stones 2 pounds. I
kept one pair of my old jeans so I can remind myself now and again of where I
had allowed myself to get to. My wife says I have a cute tush again (I might be
exaggerating).
I cannot claim that this will work for everyone – it depends
on each individual’s physiology and whether there are any other underlying
factors. However, it worked for me. Just remember if you decide to try this – MAKE SURE YOU INVOLVE YOUR GP AT EVERY
STEP!
And now, the diet! You’ll notice it’s not all
exactly 600 calories. That’s because I slightly tailored it to that fact that I
work for a living (albeit a desk job) and was doing increasing levels of
exercise over time. Plus you have to have the occasional treat!Download the diet (PDF)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)